Journalists finally acknowledged that they worked to shut down a theory surrounding the origin of COVID-19, simply because President Trump and other Republicans were promoting it.
The theory – which they once labeled as “racist conspiracy theory” or “fringe nonsense” – suggests that the virus may have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and has recently been gaining steam.
The saga has led to yet another reckoning for mainstream media journalists about groupthink and bias in the industry as they rapidly attempt to cover up for their embarrassing decision to bury the theory.
Faced with criticism that they blasted the theory last year for political reasons, some reporters have admitted its Republican origins with figures like Sen. Tom Cotton, former President Donald Trump, and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo played into why they disparaged it.
ABC News Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl suggested on ABC’s “This Week” that figures like Trump and Pompeo were not taken seriously by members of the media, saying “now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry.”
“Yes, I think a lot of people have egg on their face,” Karl said. “This was an idea that was first put forward by Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, Donald Trump, and look some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. Because Trump was saying so much else, that was just out of control, and because he was, you know, making a frankly racist appeal talking about Kung Flu, and the China virus, he said flatly this came from that lab, and it was widely dismissed … but now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry.”
New York Times reporter David Leonhardt also conceded Sunday many journalists dismissed the lab-leak theory solely because Cotton, a Trump ally and longtime critic of China, proposed it.
“I think people made this mistake. I think a lot of people on the political left and a lot of people in the media made the mistake. They said, ‘wow if Tom Cotton is saying something, it can’t be true.’ Or they assumed that. And that’s not right,” he said on CNN.
NBC’s Chuck Todd addressed the issue on “Meet The Press” Sunday, saying that “for many,” the lab leak theory got “tangled up in politics” and was conflated with one theory that the Chinese released the virus deliberately.
While interviewing former Trump Deputy National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger, Todd repeatedly suggested anti-China rhetoric was to blame for media dismissals of the virus.
“Did in some ways, the sort of irrational attacks on China, did that slow down efforts of the intelligence community to actually do some fact-finding?” Todd asked.
“Well, look, I think what slowed down efforts more than anything else were the early statements that were published by a few scientists dismissing the idea that it could have come out of a lab,” Pottinger said. “And in fact, caricaturing people who thought that it might have come out of a lab.”
Washington Post reporter Aaron Blake wrote an analysis titled, “The vexing ‘lab leak’ theory on China and the coronavirus,” in which he defended reporters dismissing the Trump administration claims that there was a high probability the virus originated in a lab.
“Given everything we know about how Trump handled such things, caution and skepticism were invited. That (very much warranted) caution and skepticism spilled over into some oversimplification, particularly when it came to summarizing the often more circumspect reporting,” Blake wrote.
The Washington Post’s Josh Rogin blasted reporters on Saturday for their sudden about-face, saying the facts on the ground had not changed out of the blue, and accusing them of bias, “general incompetence” and even Trump Derangement Syndrome.
President Biden ordered the intelligence community last week to investigate the origins of the virus and report back in 90 days – after suddenly ending a Trump administration investigation into the origins of the virus.
Outlets from the Washington Post and New York Times to CNN and NPR have gone from outright mockery of the idea to taking it seriously, and “fact checks” have been updated with editor’s notes about why the theory is no longer necessarily “debunked.”
Author: Ray Barch